Site Loader

Romans Are Militant People Essay, Research Paper

In many modern books written about Ancient Rome and its people, The Romans

are frequently portrayed as brutal and unforgiving people who enjoy force and though it is

diverting to see people being injured and killed to the point of compulsion. It is my end to

set up wheather this categorization is justified or if it is merely an hyperbole of what a

little group of people enjoy.

While it is known that in Rome there were gladiator battles, public whippings and

bondage was legal and common. It is besides of import to understand merely how advanced the

Romans were. The Longman Dictonary of the English Language Defines civilized as? of

or being peoples of a state in a province of civilization. ? I think that by this definition, the

Romans were civilized, the educated being able to compose and detailed records being kept by

many historiographers.

The Romans besides had written Torahs and authorities, including an assembly for the

poorer categories. In fact, Their system of jurisprudence was really rather advanced ( even if it was

designed to assist the rich ) . ? The thought was accepted that a adult male? s purposes ought to be

taken into history, and there was less importance attached to what he did and what he

meant to make. The following thing to go established was the impression that all work forces must be

treated equally. ? This manner of thought was really advanced and non barbarian or barbarian

at all, in fact the same impression that all work forces should be treated every bit was non established in

America and other states for many old ages to come.

It is know common cognition that, in Ancient Rome, people frequently attended and

enjoyed gladiator battles to the decease, wild animal Hunts, naval conflicts and chariot racing, all

of which frequently had spiritual beginnings. During the reign of Caesar, 1000s of work forces and

animate beings were butchered merely to do a Roman vacation. The Romans Besides enjoyed

dumb shows and dramas which excessively were frequently really violent in nature. ? It was non

uncommon for a condemned felon to be executed [ on phase ] as portion of the drama. ?

Contemporary beginnings say that it is frequently portrayed that slaves were treated more

harshly than was really the instance. Slaves in Rome really did hold some privileges. ? It

is clear that slaves owned land, belongings, ships, involvements in concern concerns, even slaves

of their ain, and that their rights were protected by law. ? In most instances, slaves were

citizens of conquered lands who had been spared and put into bondage alternatively of being

executed. This in itself was a privilege. Often slaves were trained by their? Masterss? in a

trade, giving them accomplishments and once more profiting them. ? For a adult male from a? backward? race

might be brought within the picket of civilisation, educated and trained in a trade or

profession, and turned into a utile member of society. ? Although this infusion is clearly

written by person non a slave, it proves that a slave may larn a batch and really profit

from bondage. In fact, Satrion of Petronius, who was one time a slave really said? Thankss

celestial spheres for bondage, it made me what you see today. ? Although this lone history of one

adult male, it shows that at least some people really recognized the benefits that slavery

brought them.

On the other manus, some slaves Masterss treated their slaves really ill. In the

eyes of the Roman jurisprudence, a slave was the absolute belongings of his maestro and he could bring down

any sort of punis

hment on his that he chose and whipping, anguish, and the slaying of slaves

was common, and some slaves lived in changeless fright of their Masterss. Often Masterss

would assail their slaves for the most minor of grounds, and frequently because they wanted to

take their choler out. ? Farm slaves frequently toiled in concatenation packs, populating like animate beings and in a

changeless fright of the whip or the cross. ? ? It was common in condemnable instances for slaves?

grounds to be given under anguish, and the jurisprudence of the Imperial age was explicit on how to

make so. ?

? These hapless, undersized slaves. Their tegument was black and bluish with contusions, their

dorsums covered with cuts from the whip. They were covered with shreds, non apparels, and it

was barely adequate to do them decent. They had been branded on the brow and half

of their hair was shaved off. On their legs they wore Fe chains. ? This was the

description of the rough conditions at a flourmill, written by Apuleius.

Unfortunately, many slaves were treated really severely but there were many Masterss

that treated their slaves good and sometimes even respected their slaves. These peculiar

slaves were frequently more gifted at a peculiar trade than their maestro. Many slaves were

frequently released by their Masterss. ? It was discovered that, the nearer the batch of a slave

approached a free adult male, the more utile he was. ? This realisation helped slaves constantly.

Although much of the grounds portrays the Romans as brutal, unforgiving and

obsessed with force, we must look at precisely why this is though. When authors try to

prove that the Roman were obsessed with force, they frequently refer to the gladiator battles,

chariot races, wild animal Hunts, and largely the maintaining of slaves. However, when you

expression at this list of? enertainments? , you see that they are all similar to things that are being

done today. For illustration, pugilism, although the regulations are more rigorous and the drawerss

Don? t battle to the decease, they do crush each other, doing long-run harm to both. This

International Relations and Security Network? t all that different from gladiator battles! Chariot racing is really similar to NASCAR

rushing. As for the wild animal Hunts, at least those animate beings had a clean opportunity. Today

huntsmans are paying fees to run doped animate beings in confined Parkss. Acerate leaf to state that

bondage continued good into the nineteenth Century. Although the Romans watch these events to

see force and decease. The same can be said for all of those people who slow down at an

car accident to see if you can see any blood.

Therefor, the Romans were no more violent as a society than our ain. We have

the same kind of amusement and bask the same violent things. I think that is unjust to

state that the Romans were obsessed with force when the American people do the same


Work Cited

P Mantin & A ; R Pulley, The Roman World: From Republic to Empire, Cambridge

University Press, England, 1992

KR Bradley, Slavery and Rebellion in the Roman World, Indiana University Press,

Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 1989

Longman Dictionary if the English Languages, WM Clowes Ltd. , Beccles & A ; London,

England, 1984

REC Burrell, The Romans and Their World, A. Wheaton & A ; Co. , Exeter, England, 1976

RH Barrow, The Romans, Penguin Books, Ltd. , Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England,


G. Alfoldy, The Social History of Rome, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore,

Maryland, USA, 1991

Post Author: admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *