Site Loader

Sirs Aguecnheek And Belch Essay, Research Paper

Observations & A ; Lessons learned, by an alky, through characters, Shakespeare introduced in his Twelfth Night: Sir Andrew Aguecheek, plotter, or guiltless bystander? Sir Toby Belch, is he a cunning freeloader, or a bibulous buffoon? Furthermore, who, metaphorically talking, will submerge in the terminal?

N.B. , Olivia inquiries Feste the sap [ really a professional witty sap ] : ? What? s a bibulous adult male like, sap? ? Feste answers: ? Like a drowned adult male, a sap, and a lunatic. One drink excessively many makes him foolish ; the 2nd makes him huffy [ loony ] ; and the 3rd drowns him? She and Feste were discoursing her cousin, Sir Toby? inquiring if he should necessitate detoxification? ( 1.5.95-97 ) following a show of inebriation in her Chamberss.

One reading Twelfth Night for the first clip might believe the buffoons Feste and Fabian are at the bosom of wit: non so, they are really bystanders, or helpers to who I feel are the adversaries, Sir Toby and the fille de chambre Maria ; yet, Sir Toby and his cohort Sir Andrew are at the nucleus of wit throughout the drama. Sir Andrew nevertheless, is by no agencies an adversary ; besides, he is merely excessively simple to antagonise anyone, and to his recognition slightly admits his defect ( 2.3.79-80 ) . He is like a kid, or pawn ; ever subservient to Sir Toby, who takes full advantage of his childlike qualities. In Fabian? s words? He? s your beloved small marionette, Sir Toby? ( 3.2.46 ) . Following this line a confusing issue arises ; Sir Toby? s answer to Fabian? I? ve been beloved to him, approximately two thousand lbs? ( 3.2.47 ) . Implying that he has given, or loaned Sir Andrew money, yet throughout the text one is led to believe that Sir Toby is smartly sponging from Sir Andrew, e.g. Toby to Andrew? Thou hadst need direct for more money? Send for more money knight, ? ( 2.1.176-81 ) Is the cunning Sir Toby lying to Fabian?

Sir Toby has been the focal point of this author? s attending during the debut to Shakespeare? s work. One will larn from his character that Sir Toby? s trickery and bizarre behaviour are brought about by his dependence to alcohol.

Epigram by: Thomas Love PeacockO? non rummy is he who from the floor, can lift entirely, and still imbibe more.

But rummy is he, who prostrate prevarications, without the power to imbibe or lift.

Feste, and Maria allude to Sir Toby? s dependence in the undermentioned statements, ? If Sir Toby would discontinue imbibing you? d [ Maria ] be as witty a immature dame as any in Illyria? ( 1.5.23-25 ) . Rarely is he without a bottle, or the chambermaid Maria who caters to his caprices with marriage in head. Then Maria says to Sir Toby, ? You must come place earlier at dark? restrict yourself to what? s sensible proper? this tippling and imbibing will be the ruin of you? ( 1.3. 5-15 ) . ( These remarks will turn out to be prophetic as the drama continues. )

The best illustration of Sir Toby? s trickery is his and Maria? s gulling of Malvolio. After Malvolio? s foolish show ( 3.4.15-57 ) in forepart of Olivia, and her go forthing to recognize Viola/Sebastian, the plotters could hold called their buffoonery off. Alternatively, Toby chose to go on by stating Maria and Fabian the followers: ? Come we? ll have him in a dark room and edge? We may transport it therefore for our pleasance and his repentance till our really pastime, tired out of breath, motivate us to hold mercy on him? ( 3.4.134-37 ) . Earlier in the same scene, Olivia says to Maria: ? Where? s Malvolio? He is sad and civil, [ but he ] suits good for a retainer with my lucks? ( 3.4.5-6 ) . Olivia, talking once more provinces: ? I would non hold him fail for half my dowery? ( 3.4.61-62 ) . It is absolutely clear that Olivia values Malvolio? s part to her estate, and anyone seeking to destruct him will probably endure her wrath. Sir Toby was clearly at the bosom of this trickery.

The pandemonium continues when being spurned by Olivia, Sir Andrew throws a temper fit, and threatens to go forth. Sir Toby nevertheless, disregarding the fact that Andrew is a coward, e.g. , ? if you opened him and found plenty blood to choke off the pes of a flea, I? ll eat the remainder of him? ( 3.2.50-55 ) , convinces him a affaire d’honneur is in order ; heroism will win the manus of Olivia. He is so sent off to compose a challenge addressed to Viola/Cesario who he believes, and justly so, has captured Olivia? s bosom. In the average clip, while Andrew is off composing his note filled with? Pepper and acetum? ( 3.4.137 ) , the cut-ups are watching Malvolio go the idol of buttockss. The zenith of their practical gag is reached when, due to his convoluted lunacy, Malvolio is locked off in darkness to be pestered at will ( mentioned before ) by plotters: Sir Toby, Maria, Feste, and Fabian.

Sir Andrew returns with his note and the plotters gather unit of ammunition to reexamine it, Fabian stating: ? more [ fresh fish ] for merrymaking? ( 3.4.134 ) . As Sir Andrew is sent to the garden Sir Toby destroys the note, stating Fabian? Now I won? T deliver this missive, [ ? ] the behaviour of the immature gentleman suggests that he can look after himself [ ? ] this missive, being a chef-d’oeuvre of ignorance, will bring forth no panic in the young person. [ ? ] He? ll know it comes from a dunce? ( 3.4.168-174 ) .

Sir Toby heads off Viola/Cesario and delivers Sir Andrews challenge in individual ; whereupon, Viola insists she has non brought injury to anyone, unless by some inadvertence. Sir Toby warns Viola to be prepared, this knight is known for his art, and escorts her to the garden ; where Sir Andrew is waiting in trepidation at the idea of a affaire d’honneur. In fact, Sir Andrew offers his Equus caballus? grey Capilet? ( 3.4.278 ) to name the affaire d’honneur off ; nevertheless, Sir Toby will hold none of that, for it would botch the conviviality.

The affaire d’honneur finally concludes with no injury done to the participants ; doubtless, Sir Andrews? s cowardliness is revealed, which does non look to unnerve him, one manner, or the other. Following the affaire d’honneur, Sir Toby slips off from the garden along with Maria. Their finish is the coal shed T

O twit the hapless Malvolio ; nevertheless, after witnessing Feste? s superb show of inhuman treatment? feigning to be the minister of religion, they realize that their buffoonery has been carried a spot excessively far. The tabular arraies begin to turn against Sir Toby, and Maria, when they return to run into the existent Sebastian. The ferocious Sebastian ( who has already encountered Sir Andrew ) fleetly throws Sir Toby to the land ; Sir Toby handed a blade as he gets to his pess begins merchandising blows with Sebastian. Olivia witnesses the bash and rapidly interruptions it up stating Sir Toby that, ? he belongs in a cave, and that she will no longer digest his misbehaviour? ( 4.2.46-48 ) . Toby so shuffles off with his tail between his legs to cream his lesions and be after his going with Maria, cognizing he has worn out his welcome.

Following their return, Sir Toby? s true character is revealed to all by the awful scene of him call on the carpeting Sir Andrew in the evilest of footings naming hapless Andrew,

? an buttocks caput, a thin- faced rogue, a cockscomb [ simpleton ] , and chump [ person easy deceived ] ? ( 5.1.203-4 ) . This peculiar outburst even Sir Andrew has no problem groking. He and all in attending, so realize Sir Toby is no friend, and that Sir Andrew has been taken for a ( natural sap ) . This scene is where Olivia is affectingly sweet to hapless Sir Andrew ; those who witness his humiliation experience a deep unhappiness for him.

Sir Andrew drew my attending early on ; there is no inquiry that he was a simple adult male missing the bravery to harm a fly. I must acknowledge nevertheless, my position is skewed by the fact that I non merely read the text ; I besides watched the movie. In the movie, there was a peculiarly affecting minute where Sir Andrew responded to Sir Toby, ? ? I, I was adored one time excessively? ( 2.4.181 ) . Elizabeth Brunner, in her essay titled: Sir Andrew in Our Bosom: Memories of Adoration, mentions the same scene so articulately, ? these words trigger frights that our ain prime has [ ? ] faded, that love-worthy ego lingers decennaries back, and that our achievements fail to run into our one time foreseen promise. ? [ 1 ]

In the context of my thesis, and the usage of character analysis to establish it upon, my decision is, ( metaphorically of class ) Sir Toby? drowns himself. For all his puffed up swaggering, it became evident that he was a shoal, weak adult male, utilizing prevarications, and vino, as a crutch to near life. Sir Andrew on the other manus, merely happened to be in the locality when the secret plan against Malvolio was hatched. He was besides clearly set up to court Olivia by Sir Toby, perchance, in the hopes that he ( Sir Toby ) could pull strings her estate.

Lessons learned: I have likely learned more about reading and authorship in the past few hebdomads than I have my full life. I ne’er dreamed I could be so challenged by a 16th century poet and dramatist. I have learned that in a drama one must invariably reevaluate what characters are making, and stating ; besides, their looks, organic structure linguistic communication, when they come in, when they leave, are they being honest. For illustration, Sir Toby stating Maria that Sir Andrew knew four linguistic communications by bosom, yet it became clear he did non hold a hint what? accost? meant ( 1.2.46-56 ) , or the Catholic term? incardinate? ( 5.1.180 ) . One must pay careful attending to Shakespeare? s work, for their powers of judgement are challenged by every bend of phrase. Some of his messages are elusive between the line metaphors ; yet, some are clear? like a sticker to the bosom. This author is peculiarly enthralled by the manner he can depict: the characters actions, put words in their oral cavities, give them a alone personality, and at the same clip show their defects, and deepest feelings, or should I state, give them? a bosom and psyche? with so few words.

Shakespeare? s clever usage of dramatic sarcasm? , and his manner of edifying human nature has brought our universe a superb, disorderly, romantic comedy, although at times a dark one, with his Twelfth Night: I might add, my debut to Shakespeare was clearly enhanced by holding the ability to see the movie. By attaching faces and voices to the characters, this experience has been a true delectation. Thankss, Professor!

Closing CommentUnbeknownst to most people, those brought down ( drowned ) by intoxicant, do non take a dim position, nor are they intemperate, of those who have the ability to command intoxicant. Nor does their sense of wit diminish with soberness ; to the contrary, their senses have recovered, and they relate with truth events being played out before them ; why, because many have, as they say, been at that place? done that. In fact, retrieving people are a leery batch, they question ; why non, indulge in the pleasance of imbibing intoxicant ; provided of class, it is done with moderateness, and no injury is done to others?

If they could? they would & # 8230 ;

Plants Cited and Definition1. ) hypertext transfer protocol: //.members.tripod.com/~ElizBrunner/scholar/twelfthnightandrew.html2. ) Sarcasm

I? Ro? ny [ & # 63307 ; R & # 601 ; nee ] ( plural I? Ro? New Yorks ) noun

1.humor based on antonyms: a type of wit based on utilizing words to propose the antonym of their actual significance

2.something humourous based on contradiction: something said or written that uses sardonic wit

3.incongruity: incongruousness between what really happens and what might be expected to go on, particularly when this disparity seems absurd or absurd

4.incongruous thing: something that happens that is incongruous with what might be expected to go on, particularly when this seems absurd or absurd

5.See dramatic sarcasm

6.See Socratic sarcasm

[ Early on sixteenth century. Via Latin ironia, from Greek eir & # 333 ; neia, ? pretended ignorance, ? formed from eir & # 333 ; Ns, ? hypocrite, ? of unsure beginning: possibly formed from eirein, ? to say. ? ]

Encarta? World English Dictionary? & A ; ( P ) 1999,2000 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Developed for Microsoft by Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

33a

Post Author: admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *