Site Loader

& # 8211 ; 3 Dimensions Of Behavior Essay, Research Paper

1. The two people I will analyse on the three dimensions of disposition are my parents, a adult female named Diane and her hubby Andrew. Diane is a 49 twelvemonth old adult female who is presently unemployed. She was the frailty president of a building company. She has been divorced one time. She has been married to Andrew for over 24 old ages. She is the female parent of three kids. I am the 2nd Born of her three kids. Andrew is a 47 twelvemonth old adult male whose business is supervisor of a big warehouse. This is his first and lone matrimony. He is the male parent of 2 of Diane & # 8217 ; s kids. I am the first Born of his two kids. To cognize where I would put these two people on the three dimensions of disposition you must first understand what the three dimensions are. & # 8220 ; The first dimension is high and low addition. High gainers receive big doses of stimulation, hence, they are normally diffident and like a quiet environment. Low gainers do non have adequate stimulation, hence, they seek out new signifiers of stimulation and talk more frequently. The R A S ( reticulate triping system ) in the centre of the encephalon root and the thalamus in the encephalon root control this dimension. How high or low these parts of the encephalon are set at determines your topographic point on this dimension & # 8221 ; . & # 8220 ; The 2nd dimension is deliberation-liberation. A calculated individual deliberates, programs, and organizes a great trade. A liberated individual Acts of the Apostless on the goad of the minute and seldom programs or organizes anything. The frontal lobes of the encephalon and the limbic system of the encephalon

( page 2 )

control this dimension. Where you are on this dimension depends on to what extent the frontal lobes control the limbic system & # 8221 ; . & # 8220 ; The 3rd dimension is positive approach-negative backdown. A positive individual is an optimist. A negative individual is a pessimist. The left and right hemispheres of the encephalon control this dimension. Whether you have more left or right hemisphere alpha rhythm determines your topographic point on this dimension & # 8221 ; .

2. In the undermentioned diagrams I will demo where I believe Diane and Andrew to be on the three dimensions of disposition.

High gain-low addition dimension:

high addition low addition

^ ^

Andrew Diane

Deliberation-liberation dimension:

deliberate liberated

^ ^

Andrew Diane

Positive approach-negative backdown dimension:

positive negative

^ ^

Diane Andrew

I believe Diane to be in the center of the addition dimension. She

( page 3 )

likes to travel out and make things, but, she is merely as happy remaining place and reading or watching telecasting. She fits the descriptions that Ornstein gives on this dimension. She likes stimulation, but, she does non wish it all the clip. Ornstein believes most people are in the center of the three dimensions, Diane is one of the people in the center of the addition dimension. I believe Andrew to be really high addition. Andrew does non wish to travel out and make things, he would instead remain place and ticker telecasting. Andrew does non wish to hold people see his house because he wants a quiet environment all the clip. Andrew fits most of the descriptions of a high gainer that Ornstein gives. He likes a quiet environment with small stimulation. I believe Diane to be really liberated. She is mussy, unorganised, and ever tardily. The

merely ground she cleans the house is because of Andrew’s ailments about the muss. Diane fits Ornstein’s description of this dimension about absolutely. She is like most other liberated people. I believe Andrew to be the antonym of Diane, he is really calculated. Andrew plans and organizes everything. He is ever on clip, sometimes he is even early. Andrew fits Ornstein’s descriptions of this dimension about absolutely. He is like most other deliberate people and the antonym of Diane. I believe Diane to be a positive attack individual. She is ever happy and looking for the best in every state of affairs. Almost nil can do her feel sad. She fits Ornstein’s description of this dimension really good. Diane is a true optimist. I believe Andrew to be a negative backdown individual. He is ever unhappy about

( page 4 )

something. He seldom finds any wit in the gags he is told. He besides is prejudiced about race dealingss and homosexualism. Andrew fits some of Ornstein & # 8217 ; s descriptions on this dimension. Andrew is a true pessimist.

3. Even though Diane and Andrew are about at the opposite terminals of each other on the three dimensions of disposition, they get along really good. The ground why they get along so good is because they deal with their differences like mature grownups. Andrew has ne’er fought with Diane, no affair how heated an statement got. Andrew tells Diane to travel sit down and chill away. This is the behaviour that has kept their matrimony together for about 25 old ages. They besides compromise on what to make with their free clip on weekends. An illustration would be Andrew wants to remain place and watch athleticss on Sunday, Diane wants to travel to the local film theatre. They resolve this job by compromising. This hebdomad they will remain place and watch athleticss on telecasting. Following hebdomad they will travel to the theatre and see the film. They may kick to each other, but, they compromise to decide their jobs.

4. I believe the three dimensions of disposition to be a really utile tool in understanding another individuals behaviour. The three dimensions helped me understand the matrimony of Diane and Andrew. I thought that people on the opposite terminals of the three dimensions would non acquire along. Analyzing Diane and Andrew made me recognize this non true. Merely as Diane and Andrew are non the same, neither is anyone else. They learned to compromise so that they

( page 5 ) could populate together, I believe everyone else needs to compromise so that the universe could larn to populate together without major jobs. I think most people would hold with my measurings of Diane and Andrew on the three dimensions of disposition, except for the first born kid of Diane, whose name is James. James is 28 old ages old. I believe he would state that I am incorrect and he would mensurate his parents to acquire a better measuring. I believe this would go on if I asked him how accurate I was in mensurating his parents because James is a really untrusty individual. He doubts everything and anything anyone has to state. Other than James, about everyone else would hold with my measurings of Diane and Andrew. For illustration, their youngest kid, their girl Jessica, agreed with my measurings. I explained the three dimensions of disposition to Jessica every bit best as I could to a 10 twelvemonth old kid. She agreed with my measurings because of the illustrations I gave her about the behaviour of people on the different terminals of the three dimensions of disposition.

Post Author: admin